ICE8000 Integrity Related Behavior and Awards Identification Standards

Chapter I General Provisions

1.1 Take note of some honest people and adopt effective measures to prevent untrustworthy behavior in their affiliates. In order to encourage honest people, promote social integrity, reduce transaction costs, and enhance human well-being, the World Credit Organization (WCO) develops this standard in accordance with internationally accepted legal principles and international practices.

1.2 The main legal basis for the development, application and implementation of this standard is as follows:

(1) The principle of freedom of the Constitution. The constitutions of the vast majority of countries in the world give people the freedom to defend their legitimate rights, the freedom to maintain social justice and the freedom to express their opinions.

(2) The principle of public order and goodness of law. This legal principle gives people the right to maintain social justice. The basic principles of civil law in most countries of the world include the principles of public order and good customs.

(3) The principle of good faith in law. This legal principle gives people the obligation of good faith. Most countries in the world regard the principle of good faith as the basic law of their civil and commercial laws.

(4) The principle of freedom of contract in law, also known as the principle of free agreement. This legal principle gives people the freedom to enter into a civil contract. The basic principles of civil law in most countries of the world include the principle of freedom of contract.

1.3 The conduct of the application and implementation of this standard shall be deemed to be the tripartite or multi-party contractual act of the World Credit Organization (WCO) in Delaware, USA, as an attestation or supervisor, and The relevant disputes arising from this act are applicable to and protected by the laws of the State of Delaware and the United States, and the jurisdiction is also the International Court of Ethics or the Delaware Court of the United States and the United States Federal Court. If the parties have agreed otherwise or otherwise stated in the applicable law and/or jurisdiction, the binding does not involve the World Credit Organization (WCO).

1.4 This standard is applicable to the identification of integrity related behaviors and reward attribution.

1.5 The identification of integrity-related behaviors and reward attributions follows the principles of objectivity, fairness and rationality.

1.6 In order to prevent moral hazard, the applicant should provide a credit card or valid identification and establish a credit file.

1.7 World Credit Organization (WCO) encourages and supports people to sincerely praise, praise, and thank others.

Members of the World Credit Organization (WCO) should actively practice integrity-related behaviors and should actively reward integrity-related behaviors.

1.8 Rewards for integrity-related behaviors include realistic rewards and credit rewards.

The term "association and association" as used in this standard refers to the direct or indirect control, controlled relationship, and other relationships that have important influences between organizations.

Organizations referred to in this standard include: various types of units, individuals, and regions.

The term "integrity actors" as used in this standard refers to the units, individuals, and regions that have made good faith behaviors.

The actual rewards referred to in this standard refer to the material rewards and development opportunities that the actor immediately obtains due to its integrity-related behaviors, including bonuses, promotion, salary increase, and increase in purchases. The incentives are based on relevant systems by stakeholders. The contract value or the customary value is closely related to the actual value brought by the interested party and the behavior habit of the interested person.

The credit reward referred to in this standard refers to the spiritual reward and potential opportunities obtained by the actor for its integrity-related behavior, including psychological pleasure, honor, pride, credibility, social respect, potential development opportunities, and credit information. The real spread of the reward is realized, and the size of the reward value is closely related to the speed of credit information dissemination and social morality and the value orientation of the public.

The senior personnel referred to in this standard include legal representatives, actual controllers, board members and secretary of the board of directors, members of the board of supervisors, secretaries, managers and deputy managers of the board of supervisors.

The actual controller referred to in this standard refers to the person who actually controls the behavior of the unit for various reasons, although the name is not the legal representative or the highest leader of the decision-making system.

The ICE8000 credit institution referred to in this standard, also known as the ICE8000 international credit institution or the World Credit Organization (WCO) member credit institution, refers to the requirements of the ICE8000 international credit standard system in terms of knowledge structure, work ability and professional ethics, and is awarded the World Credit Organization. (WCO) certification, in the credit evaluation and other credit practice work have the right and obligation to comply with the ICE8000 international credit standard system standards, to prevent their own abuse of credit evaluation and other rights or damage to the legitimate rights and interests of other types of credit companies and other credit practitioners. The ICE8000 credit institution is a member unit of the World Credit Organization (WCO), not a branch, representative office, agency or subordinate organization of the World Credit Organization (WCO). According to the business scope of ICE8000 credit institutions, ICE8000 credit institutions can also be called ICE8000 credit reporting agencies, ICE8000 Lixin institutions, ICE8000 training institutions, and ICE8000 management consulting organizations.

1.9 The appraisal opinions published in accordance with this standard are only the principled appraisal opinions made on the premise that the evidence materials are true and correct. The substantive appraisal opinions on the integrity related behavior and the attribution of rewards shall be decided according to the ICE8000 International Credit Standard System International Credit Dispute Arbitration Standard or the ICE8000 International Credit Standard System International Credit Dispute Trial Standard.

For the identification of the principle of integrity-related behavior and reward attribution, the words "principle" should be indicated.

Whether it is a principled appraisal or a substantive appraisal, it is a view based on presumed facts or real facts and is only for reference by all parties concerned. Moreover, the appraisal opinion cannot substitute for the independent thinking and independent judgment of the relevant parties. The relevant parties should read the appraisal opinions comprehensively and rationally, decide their own reference value, and independently bear the consequences of misreading due to out of context.

1.10 All parties applying this standard shall, in the process of applying this standard, abide by the principle of good faith, the moral bottom line, and the social responsibility bottom line, and exercise and assume the rights and obligations stipulated in this standard.

1.11 All parties to this standard are deemed to have fully understood and committed to comply with all the provisions of this standard. However, if any party to this standard finds any unfairness in any of the provisions of this standard, it has the right to publicly declare that it is not subject to public disclosure of the relevant circumstances and reasons and written notice to the World Credit Organization (WCO). Terms and conditions.

Chapter II Standards for Integrity Related Behavior

2.1 It is noted that an organization's act of good faith often means abandoning short-term behavior and illegitimate interests. Therefore, an organization that makes and adheres to good faith requires multi-party support, especially the support of its affiliates.

2.2 After an organization makes a good faith behavior, if its affiliated organization does not object to the act of honesty, then such non-objection is a good faith association, and the affiliated organization and related credit recipients belong to the integrity-related actors.

2.3 The essence of integrity-related behavior is a kind of [actively undertake higher social responsibility behavior]. Although the integrity-related behavior is not a good faith behavior, although the integrity-related actors do not directly engage in honest behavior, but the integrity-related actors have a certain indirect causal relationship or important influence relationship.

Chapter III Controlled Integrity Related Behavior and Controlled Integrity Related Behavior

Standards for influential integrity behavior

3.1 Integrity-related behaviors in one of the following relationships that meet one of the following factors shall be identified as controlled integrity-related behaviors, and the perpetrator and relevant credit recipients shall be identified as controlled integrity associations:

(1) Integrity-related actors are direct or indirect controlling shareholders of integrity units;

(2) Integrity-related actors have the right to appoint or decide high-level personnel of the integrity unit;

(3) Integrity-related behaviors have control over the integrity of the agent because of the reasons for loans, guarantees, purchases, and sales;

(4) Integrity-related actors have control over honest actors for other reasons.

3.2 Integrity-related behaviors in which one of the following factors exists in the relationship should be identified as controlled integrity-related behavior, and the perpetrator and relevant credit recipients should be identified as controlled integrity associations:

(1) A unit directly or indirectly controlled by a good faith actor;

(2) Units appointed by high-level personnel by honest actors;

(3) A unit that is a high-level person by a good faith actor;

(4) Organizations controlled by honest actors for reasons of loans, guarantees, purchases, and sales;

(5) Organizations controlled by honest actors for other reasons.

3.3 Integrity-related behaviors that are consistent with one of the following factors should be identified as influential integrity-related behaviors, and the perpetrator and relevant credit recipients should be identified as influential integrity-related organizations:

(1) Integrity-related actors and honest actors have direct or indirect investment relationships, but there is no controlling relationship;

(2) Integrity-related actors and honest actors are both controllers or controlled persons of third parties;

(3) Integrity actors are the units of intermediate management personnel and technical backbones;

(4) There are other related relationships, which can be reasonably considered by people to have an important influence on the behavior of honest actors.

Chapter IV reward attribution of integrity-related behavior

4.1 Natural persons engaged in integrity-related behaviors, credit rewards and realistic rewards belong to natural persons. Where the unit engages in integrity-related behaviors, the credit rewards belong to the staff of the unit, the high-level personnel of the unit, and the staff who have a certain causal relationship with the integrity-related behavior; the attribution of the actual reward is determined by the singer, and the person who has not decided is attributed to the unit.

4.2 In the case of a good faith relationship in a certain area, if the specific actor can be identified, the reward will be directly attributed to the specific actor according to the relevant provisions of this standard; if the specific actor is not determined, the actual reward is not obtained, and the credit reward is All persons in the area (except for publicly opposed to this act of integrity) are obtained, and the order of attribution is as follows:

(1) The region is the first credit recipient;

(2) Regional decision-making systems (such as parliaments) and their members (such as parliamentarians) are second credit recipients;

(3) The regional administrative system and its senior staff are the third credit recipients;

(4) The regional judicial system and its members are the fourth credit recipients;

(5) The regional administrative department and its senior personnel whose responsibilities are related to the integrity-related behavior are the fifth credit recipients;

(6) The ordinary people who actively support the integrity-related behavior (referring to people other than the top five, the same below) are the sixth credit recipients;

(7) The ordinary people who did not publicly oppose the integrity-related behavior were the seventh credit recipients.

4.3 If a natural person engages in integrity-related behavior, he is the recipient, and both the actual reward and the credit reward belong to him.

4.4 If a unit engages in integrity-related behavior, the order of credit rewards is:

(1) The unit is the first credit recipient;

(2) The highest leader of the unit decision-making system (the corresponding chairman of the board of directors, etc.), the legal representative and the actual controller are the second credit recipients;

(3) The top leader of the unit execution system (the general manager and other corresponding personnel) is the third credit recipient;

(4) Members of the unit decision-making system (directors of directors, directors, etc.) and members of the supervisory system (supervisors and other corresponding personnel) are the fourth credit recipients;

(5) Other units (Note: Others refer to those other than the above three items) are the fifth credit recipients;

(6) The middle management personnel or ordinary employees who actively participate in or promote the integrity-related behavior of the unit are the sixth credit recipients;

(7) The middle management personnel or ordinary employees who passively participate in the integrity-related behavior of the unit are the seventh credit recipients.

For mid-level managers or ordinary employees who participate in the integrity-related behavior, if there is no evidence to prove that they are the seventh credit recipients, they shall be the sixth credit recipients.

If the second, third, fourth, fifth, sixth or seventh order credit recipients are not found or not identified, they shall indicate that the order winners or “to be checked” have not been found.

After the integrity-related behavior is identified, the above-mentioned awardees shall be identified as integrity-related units and integrity-related individuals, unless there is evidence or reason to the contrary.

4.5 If more than one natural person is engaged in the act of honesty and association, the person who praises the person can be the person who is praised at the same time, or the order of attribution of the credit reward can be determined as follows:

(1) The highest leader or supreme organizer of the integrity-related behavior is the first credit recipient;

(2) The highest planner of the integrity-related behavior is the second credit recipient;

(3) Those who play an important role in the leadership, organization or planning of the integrity-related behavior are the third credit recipients;

(4) The relevant person who actively participates in or promotes the integrity-related behavior is the fourth credit recipient;

(5) The relevant personnel who passively participate in the integrity-related behavior are the fifth credit recipients.

The top leader, organizer, and top planner are both one person, and both the first winner and the second recipient are the individual.

If the second, third, fourth and fifth recipients are not found, they shall indicate that the order winner or “to be checked” has not been found.

After the integrity-related behavior is identified, the above-mentioned awardees shall be identified as individuals associated with integrity, unless there is evidence or reason to the contrary.

If more than 4.6 units jointly engage in integrity-related behaviors, after determining the order of awards of the units in accordance with Article 4.5, the credit awards shall be vested separately according to the units.

Where a natural person other than an employee of a unit or unit engages in a good faith-related behavior, after determining the order of credit awards of each participant in accordance with Article 4.5, the unit and the natural person shall respectively be credited.

Chapter V Principled Appraisal Procedure

5.1 The principle identification procedures for the integrity-related behavior and reward attribution are as follows:

(1) Application. The parties concerned filed an application with the ICE8000 credit institution, promised to abide by this standard, and promised to abide by the principle of good faith, moral bottom line, and social responsibility bottom line to submit relevant evidence and materials, and at the same time make a statement of additional conscience vows.

(2) Formal review and delivery. The ICE8000 credit institution shall conduct a formal review of the relevant application materials. If the application materials are complete, the applicant shall be served with the “Notice of Integrity-related Behavior and Award-Applying Principles of Appraisal Opinions” to the appraiser, giving them an objection period of 7 working days. If the application materials are incomplete, return the application for identification and explain the reasons.

(3) Objection. If the accredited person disagrees with an important fact, it shall promptly raise it. If the accredited person expressly declares that there is no objection, there is no objection. If the appraiser has no proper cause, if the right of dissent has not been exercised within the time limit, it shall be deemed that there is no objection and the default is to comply with this standard. If the appraiser promptly submits an overdue cause to the ICE8000 credit institution, the ICE8000 credit institution may extend the term of the dissent right according to the actual situation. When the accredited person exercises the right of dissent, he shall promise to abide by this standard in accordance with the principle of reciprocity, and promise to abide by the principle of good faith, the moral bottom line, the social responsibility bottom line to exercise the right of dissent, and the written statement of the additional conscience vows. If the accused person exercises the right of dissent, he refuses to make the above promises and statements in writing, and the objection is invalid.

(4) Issue the principle identification result. If the appraiser does not effectively exercise the right of dissent, the ICE8000 credit institution shall issue to the applicant the “Guidelines for the Appraisal of Integrity-related Behaviors and Awards.” Otherwise, the applicant shall issue a Notice of End of the Principle of Appraisal Procedures for Integrity Related Behavior and Incentive Attribution. If the applicant or the relevant party believes that the appraiser has violated the principle of good faith and exercises the right of dissent, he may be held accountable for its fiduciary duty.

5.2 In the course of practicing, the ICE8000 credit institution may publish a principled appraisal opinion on the discovered integrity-related behavior and its reward attribution in the practice document, but shall deliver the relevant practice documents to the parties and inform the parties of the objection period according to the relevant practice standards. And objection methods.

When people use the ICE8000 international credit standard system standard to publish credit evaluation information, they can issue a principled appraisal opinion on related integrity-related behaviors and reward attributions in relevant documents, but should inform the parties of the objection period and the objection method according to relevant standards.

Chapter VI Liability for breach of contract and method of investigation

6.1 If the party violates the provisions of this standard, it shall bear the following liability for breach of contract:

(1) The corresponding legal liability, namely: the legal punishment prescribed by the relevant applicable law.

(2) Corresponding credit responsibility, that is, to bear credit punishments such as internal complaints, public complaints, credit warnings, internal exposure, public exposure, joint exposure, etc.

(3) The corresponding industry self-discipline responsibility, namely: announcement of criticism, fines, cancellation of credit card, prohibition of self-discipline and other disciplines.

(4) If the breach of contract causes losses (including material damage and mental damage) to others, it shall be liable for compensation. If the breach of contract constitutes a malicious dishonesty, it shall also make punitive damages to the infringed person in accordance with international practice and the principle of common law.

6.2 Method of investigation of liability for breach of contract:

(1) According to the "ICS8000 International Credit Standard System Internal Complaint Standard" or "ICE8000 International Credit Standard System Public Complaint Standard" or "ICE8000 International Credit Standard System Credit Warning Standard" or "ICE8000 International Credit Standard System Internal Exposure Standard" or "ICE8000" International Exposure Standards for Public Credit Standards or Joint Exposure Standards for ICE8000 International Credit Standards System for credit complaints and credit penalties;

(2) Applying for arbitration under the International Credit Dispute Arbitration Commission in accordance with the ICE8000 International Credit Standards System International Credit Dispute Arbitration Standard, without the need to submit a separate arbitration agreement;

(3) Apply to the International Moral Court for trial in accordance with the ICE8000 International Credit Standards System International Credit Dispute Trial Standard;

(4) If the defaulter has the membership of the World Credit Organization (WCO), the parties also have the right to make a complaint in accordance with the World Credit Organization (WCO) Member Supervision Standards;

(5) File a lawsuit in the US Delaware Court or the US Federal Court in accordance with the laws of the State of Delaware or the United States federal law.

6.3 Violations of the provisions of this standard may and should be considered as an independent breach of contract or dishonesty. If the relevant parties appear in the process of applying this standard, such acts as fraudulent, covert, defamatory, insulting, and denying others' credit evaluation rights, the act is an independent malicious dishonesty act or an independent serious malicious dishonesty. The parties concerned have the right to merge. Investigate or separately pursue the responsibility of the independent dishonesty.

6.4 The responsibility for breach of contract in this standard shall be based on the principle of ignoring:

(1) Only the aggrieved party will take the initiative to pursue the investigation, and the defaulting party will bear the corresponding liability for breach of contract;

(2) The aggrieved party has the right to decide whether to initiate the corresponding accountability procedure for breach of contract;

(3) The aggrieved party has the right to understand the defaulting party or reach an agreement with the defaulting party.

6.5 For the employees or agents who participate in, execute, or assist the parties to breach the contract, the aggrieved party has the right to pursue its corresponding responsibility unless it proves that it is not at fault.

6.6 The World Credit Organization (WCO) shall bear economic compensation for its own faults, and the expenditure for economic compensation shall be included in the financial plan of the World Credit Organization (WCO) for the next year. If the economic compensation is large, compensation shall be made in each year.

After accepting economic compensation, the World Credit Organization (WCO) has the right to recover losses from units or individuals responsible for acts of dishonesty with gross negligence or subjective intent.

Chapter VII Supplementary Provisions

7.1 The methods of “delivery” and “notice” as mentioned in this standard include:

(1) Integrity letter delivery\notice. The sender/notifier can send a letter of integrity to the recipient/notice according to the “ICE8000 International Credit Standard System Integrity Letter Management Standard”. The time of receipt of the document as specified in the standard is the delivery/notification time.

(2) Regular letter delivery\notice. The sender/notifier may send a regular letter to the recipient/notifier, and the time of receipt of the letter by the person to be served, the person to be notified and his/her employee, adult family member or agent shall be the time of delivery/notification.

(3) Network announcement delivery\notification. If the sender/notifier cannot be served by letter, the right to use the ICE8000 International Credit Standard System Document Announcement Delivery Standard shall be served by the network announcement method. If the delivery/notification is made by means of network announcement, the delivery/notification time will be the 60th day after the first publication of the delivery announcement.

(4) Other legal and reasonable delivery/notification methods.

7.2 This standard shall be implemented as of the date of promulgation.

7.3 The terminology involved in this standard, if its meaning is not agreed in this standard, its meaning is described in the "ICE8000 International Credit Standard System International Credit Industry Terminology".

7.4 All kinds of materials submitted by relevant parties to the World Credit Organization (WCO) (or ICE8000 Credit Agency) in accordance with this standard shall be listed in the ICE8000 International Credit Standards System Document Copyright Management Standard.

7.5 If the relevant parties know or ought to have known that any of the terms or conditions of this standard have not been complied with, but still do not expressly file a written objection in time for this non-compliance, it is deemed to waive their right to file an objection. The waiving party shall bear the legal consequences such as losses caused by the waiver, and the World Credit Organization (WCO) and other parties shall not be responsible for this.

7.6 This standard will be revised and improved. All parties applying this standard should pay full attention to the revision of this standard and apply the latest version of this standard, but the behavior that occurred before the revision of this standard may not be subject to the new revised clause. The official website of the latest Chinese version of this standard is: https://www.ice8000.org/aenhw/gc/97.html .

7.7 The copyright of this standard belongs to the World Credit Organization (WCO), members can use it for free and unlimited use; non-members can use it free of charge for study, training, research, self-use, reprint, citation, adaptation, reference, reference under the premise of indicating or declaring the source. , reference. No unit or individual may plagiarize plagiarism or disguise plagiarism or otherwise infringe. Otherwise, we will jointly expose the infringing units, individuals and related personnel after the investigation of the infringement facts is clear (to issue a credit wanted order to the society). And reserves the right to pursue their legal responsibility. Do not infringe or infringe.

7.8 The standard version number is expressed as: ICE8000-abcd, where: the front-end ICE8000 indicates that this standard is one of the standards of the ICE8000 international credit standard system; a is the serial number of the standard in the ICE8000 system standard, if this standard is Abolished, the serial number is sometimes transferred to other standards; b is the initial writing time of this standard; c is the latest revision time of this standard; d is the number of revisions of this standard.

7.9 This standard is interpreted by the World Credit Organization (WCO).