Recommendation and Evaluation of Excellent Honest Works-World Credit Organization
7.7 Recommendation and evaluation of excellent honest works
The evaluation of excellent credit works is a standardized credit reward program designed by the World Credit Organization (WCO) for credit works. The applicable standard is: "ICE8000 International Credit Standard System Excellent Credit Work Evaluation Standards" (https://www.ice8000. org/acnhwgc/153.htm).
1. Evaluation criteria
1. The criteria for the grand prize. The quality of the work and its objective role have met one of the following conditions:
(1) Greatly publicized the concept of integrity, so that many people established the value of integrity or strengthened the belief of being an honest person;
(2) It has greatly popularized credit knowledge, enabling many people to have a very strong awareness and ability to prevent credit risks;
(3) The scientific research level of credit knowledge has been greatly improved.
2. The criteria for the first prize, second prize, third prize and encouragement prize are omitted.
2. Evaluation procedure
(1) Recommended. The recommender submits relevant certification materials, and the recommender should declare the terms of the oath of conscience in the recommendation materials, and disclose his name and relationship with the recommendee. Self-recommendations are not allowed.
(2) First trial. The World Credit Organization (WCO) conducts a formal review of the recommended materials, and if necessary, the World Credit Organization (WCO) appoints a special person to investigate and verify. If the recommender is an evaluation committee member of the same award, the recommendee will proceed directly to the next step without going through the preliminary review.
(3) Enter the public objection period. The public objection period is not less than 90 days. The public can express their opinions or raise objections during the publicity period. The World Credit Organization (WCO) will investigate and verify the objections.
(4) Final judgment. The World Credit Organization (WCO) will send the relevant information to the review committee of the same award, and the review committee will conduct the final review. The final decision shall be voted by secret ballot. If the number of negative votes is greater than or equal to the number of positive votes, it is deemed to be rejected, otherwise, it is deemed to have passed the final review. Those who did not vote are deemed to have abstained, and abstention has no effect on the result.
(5) Announcement of the results. The World Credit Organization (WCO) will issue a final review report and issue an honorary certificate based on the final review.
3. Independent review committee
The award-winning unit or person will naturally become a lifelong member of the award review committee, such as: the winner of the grand prize will naturally become a member of the grand prize review committee. All the judging members form the judging committee for the award, which is responsible for the final judging and cancellation. When the number of members is less than three or all of them abstain from voting, the senior managers of the Executive Council of the World Credit Organization (WCO) shall act as members.
The above content is excerpted from "Introduction to ICE8000 Credit Knowledge" (written by Fang Bangjian, free to use, but please indicate the source)