Recommendation and evaluation by international integrity experts - World Credit Organization
7.6 International Integrity Expert Recommendation and Evaluation
International Integrity Expert Evaluation is a standardized credit reward program designed by the World Credit Organization (WCO) for experts in various industries with integrity values. The applicable standard is: "ICE8000 International Credit Standard System International Integrity Expert Evaluation Standard" (https:/ /www.ice8000.org/acnhwgc/27.htm).
ICE8000 International Integrity Expert (hereinafter referred to as International Integrity Expert) is an honorary title evaluated according to the "ICE8000 International Credit Standard System International Integrity Expert Evaluation Standard", which belongs to the social honorary title publicly evaluated by social organizations. Experts, academics whose expertise promotes integrity in society. The evaluation by international integrity experts is a public welfare credit evaluation activity, and no fees are charged to units and individuals. No unit or individual may seek benefits from relevant units or individuals based on the evaluation of international integrity experts.
1. The characteristics of the evaluation work of international integrity experts
1. The review committee is independent. Those who have won the honorary title of International Integrity Expert will naturally become lifelong members of the International Integrity Expert Review Committee. All review members form the International Integrity Expert Review Committee, which is responsible for the final review of evaluation and cancellation. When the number of members is less than three or all of them abstain from voting, the senior managers of the Executive Council of the World Credit Organization (WCO) shall act as members.
2. It always follows the three principles of "openness, fairness and justice", and guarantees fairness and justice with publicity. Its openness is manifested in: the assessment standards and procedures are open; the credit information on which the assessment is based is open; the assessment procedure includes a public objection period.
3. It is public welfare, and it does not charge the evaluated object, thereby ensuring its neutrality, fairness and objectivity.
4. It neither informs nor requires the participants to participate.
5. There is a long public objection period. The public objection period for international integrity experts is 60 months, that is, 5 years. Through the 5-year public objection period, the authenticity of the recommended materials can be verified, and it can also be verified whether the experts being evaluated have firmly established their moral conscience.
Second, the significance of the evaluation by international integrity experts
With the refinement of the social division of labor and the deepening of the professionalism of various industries, all kinds of information and knowledge are vast and mixed. People's decision-making and actions increasingly need to refer to the opinions and guidance of experts, so experts have a high social influence. At the same time, experts are tempted and troubled by various interests, and it is increasingly difficult to abide by their moral conscience. Lying experts and fake experts directly or indirectly infringe upon people's legitimate rights and interests.
Through the evaluation of international integrity experts, we will affirm those experts and scholars who use their professional knowledge to promote social integrity in a certain professional field, so as to promote social integrity, reduce transaction costs, and enhance human well-being.
Third, the evaluation conditions of international integrity experts:
1. Have a very deep research on a certain professional field;
2. Never take advantage of your academic or expert status to issue false reports or make false statements to the society in violation of the principle of good faith;
4. No other record of major dishonesty.
Fourth, the assessment procedure of international integrity experts:
(1) Recommended. The recommender submits relevant certification materials, and the recommender should declare the terms of the oath of conscience in the recommendation materials, and disclose his name and relationship with the recommendee. Self-recommendations are not allowed.
(2) First trial. The World Credit Organization (WCO) conducts a formal review of the recommended materials, and if necessary, the World Credit Organization (WCO) appoints a special person to investigate and verify. If the recommender is an international integrity expert review committee member, the recommendee will proceed directly to the next step without going through the preliminary review.
(3) Enter the public objection period. The public objection period is not less than 60 months (that is, 5 years). The public can express their opinions or raise objections during the publicity period, and the World Credit Organization (WCO) will investigate and verify the objections.
(4) Hearing and final judgment. The World Credit Organization (WCO) holds a hearing, and the review committee will conduct the hearing and final review. The final decision shall be voted by secret ballot. If the number of negative votes is greater than or equal to the number of positive votes, it is deemed to be rejected, otherwise, it is deemed to have passed the final review. Those who did not vote are deemed to have abstained, and abstention has no effect on the result.
(5) Announcement of the results. The World Credit Organization (WCO) will issue a final review report and issue an honorary certificate based on the final review results.
The above content is excerpted from "Introduction to ICE8000 Credit Knowledge" (written by Fang Bangjian, free to use, but please indicate the source)