Joint Exposure (Credit Wanted Order)-World Credit Organization

6.7 Joint exposure (credit warrant)

Joint exposure, also known as credit arrest order, is a very complicated and powerful credit punishment procedure designed by the World Credit Organization (WCO). ) Standard” (https://www.ice8000.org/acnhwgc/48.htm).

Malicious dishonesty or serious dishonesty can threaten the person responsible for the dishonesty. If the person responsible for the dishonesty does not correct the dishonesty, a credit warrant will be issued. For those who refuse to correct the dishonesty, they can apply to the International Moral Court for the issuance of a credit warrant.

6.7.1. To understand joint exposure, you should pay attention to the following five points:

1. It is issued by the World Credit Organization (WCO), and the World Credit Organization (WCO) also assumes corresponding legal responsibilities.

Second, its implementation follows the principle of prudence. The World Credit Organization (WCO) generally does not issue credit notices unless the dishonesty is particularly serious and unless the evidence is particularly convincing.

Third, it is a substantive review. After the trial by the International Moral Court in accordance with the "ICE8000 International Credit Standard System International Credit Dispute Trial Standards", the ruling is issued. Internal complaints and public complaints are all forms of review. Formal examination is a review conducted on the assumption that the relevant statements, commitments and guarantees of the relevant parties are true, and that the evidence submitted by the relevant parties is true. In the case of formality review, it is only checked whether the relevant parties have made promises and guarantees, and whether the relevant materials are obviously wrong. The substantive review requires multiple parties to produce evidence and cross-examine evidence in the rigorous trial procedures of the moral court to ensure the authenticity of the relevant statements and evidence.

4. The joint exposure will publish the photo and ID number of the exposed person at the same time. It is the credit punishment implemented by the World Credit Organization (WCO) for the dishonesty with serious nature and great social harm. It is the strongest credit punishment at present. Means, also known as credit order.

5. The joint exposure is substantively reviewed by the International Moral Court as an independent case. Credit warnings, internal exposures, and public exposures are often only tools for the execution of a case, and they are the execution link of a certain case, not an independent case. For example: Zhang San sues Li Si for not repaying the arrears, and the International Moral Court judges that Li Si should pay the arrears. If Li Si still refuses to pay after the judgment takes effect, Zhang San can request the International Moral Court to conduct credit warnings, internal exposures, and public exposures. It is up to the original trial ethics judge to decide whether to publish. If Zhang San requests to issue a credit arrest warrant, the International Moral Court needs to form another moral court (the moral judge of the original trial should not participate in the moral court), as an independent case, to hear whether to issue a credit arrest warrant.

6.7.2 Which department of the World Credit Organization (WCO) decides on ICE8000 joint exposure (issue of credit arrest warrant)

Before January 3, 2009, the Legal Work Committee of the World Credit Organization (WCO) was responsible for accepting applications for ICE8000 joint exposure (credit arrest warrant) and deciding whether to issue a credit arrest warrant.

On January 3, 2009, the new statute of the World Credit Organization (WCO) came into effect. According to the new statute, the World Credit Organization (WCO) implements the basic democratic system of separation of powers. Accordingly, the Legal Affairs Committee is a department of the Executive Yuan and no longer has the power to adjudicate. The power to adjudicate is independently exercised by the World Credit Organization (WCO) Trial Committee and the Board of Supervisors. Therefore, the ICE8000 joint exposure (credit arrest warrant) will be decided by the trial committee or the supervisory board of the World Credit Organization (WCO) (the parties to the second-instance complaint can submit to the supervisory board).

On January 16, 2010, the members of the World Credit Organization (WCO) voted to pass the charter amendment and established the International Moral Court. Judgment right. Therefore, since then, the ICE8000 joint exposure (credit arrest warrant) has been accepted and decided by the International Moral Court.

6.7.3 Legal Basis for Joint Exposure

1. With the support of the CS clause, the joint exposure of persons responsible for serious dishonesty is based on the agreement of the parties, and its legal basis is the principle of free agreement in civil law.

2. Without the support of CS clauses, the joint exposure of persons responsible for serious untrustworthy acts is based on the organizational purpose and social responsibility of the World Credit Organization (WCO) as a non-governmental organization (NGO). Its legal basis It is the principle of public order and good customs in the civil law and the principle of freedom of speech in the constitution.

According to international practice, non-governmental organizations (NGOs) have assumed many responsibilities for maintaining social order and good customs, effectively solving the problem of government and market failure at the same time, and are an essential part of social harmony. For example: Greenpeace often conducts investigations on some companies that destroy the balance of natural ecology, and then publishes the investigation results.

Third, when various countries formulate laws on the protection of the right of reputation and the right of personal privacy, they generally fully consider the legal value of the law protecting the public's right to know and the public's right to be protected from harm. When the legal value of protecting the right of reputation and personal privacy conflicts with the legal value of protecting the public’s right to know and the right to avoid being harmed, the latter is given priority. Therefore, the right of reputation and personal privacy is not the umbrella of the dishonest . For example, Chinese law defines defamation as: fabricating and disseminating false facts, that is to say, disseminating true and untrustworthy information does not constitute defamation and does not violate the prohibitive provisions of the law. Of course, this is also relative. It is necessary to analyze the specific situation and pursue the balance between the right of reputation, the right of personal privacy and the public's right to know and the public's right to be free from harm.

6.7.4 Legal basis for quick complaints, internal complaints, public complaints, credit warnings, internal exposures, and public exposures

1. With the support of the CS clause, the legal basis for a party to complain or expose others is the principle of free agreement in civil law, which is to exercise the right of agreement.

2. In the absence of the support of the CS clause, the parties concerned complain and expose others, and the credit institution conducts a formal review, all of which are exercising the right of credit evaluation. Credit evaluation is essentially a kind of speech, and its legal basis is the constitution Principles of Freedom of Expression.

3. The World Credit Organization (WCO) provides a fair and just standard for all parties to complain and expose. It is its organizational purpose and social responsibility as a non-governmental organization (NGO). Its legal basis is the principle of public order and good customs in civil law and The constitutional principle of free speech.

The above content is excerpted from "Introduction to ICE8000 Credit Knowledge" (written by Fang Bangjian, free to use, but please indicate the source)