Violation of the bottom line of social responsibility and identification of responsibility attribution-World Credit Organization
3.5 Violation of the bottom line of social responsibility and identification of responsibility attribution
Violation of the bottom line of social responsibility and the identification of responsibility attribution is a right and wrong identification standard and service designed by the World Credit Organization (WCO). https://www.ice8000.org/acnhwgc/157.htm).
People can use this credit service to identify right from wrong. This service can be an independent service, and at the same time, it is generally included in the practice procedures such as internal complaints and credit warnings. Therefore, it is generally not recommended for customers to use the service alone.
3.5.1 Criteria for bottom line content of social responsibility
1. Interest holders have the right to voluntarily waive or transfer their legitimate rights and interests in the form of [express or default] contract. If the rights holder has not voluntarily given up his legitimate rights and interests, nor has he transferred his legitimate rights and interests in the form of a contract, then others should not steal, occupy, erode or covet the rights holder's legitimate rights and interests for any reason, otherwise, it is a [damage or potential damage legitimate rights and interests of others]. People can call [damage or potential damage to the legitimate rights and interests of others] as [evil].
2. The bottom line of human moral conscience is [do not do evil], and the bottom line of human social responsibility should be higher than the bottom line of moral conscience. At the same time, the content of the bottom line of social responsibility is mainly to directly or indirectly maintain the bottom line of human moral conscience.
3. The bottom line of social responsibility is divided into three items. In short, it is [tolerate evil], [do not support evil], and [respect good deeds]. The specific standards are as follows:
(1) When learning that [affiliated organization] has violated the bottom line of morality, actively urge and advise it to correct its unethical behavior before it sincerely corrects and/or apologizes, and refuses to enjoy the information provided by [affiliated organization] unethical gains. (In short: Unethical behavior by [affiliated organization] will not be tolerated until it makes good-faith corrections and/or apologizes.)
(2) When it is known that a certain person or unit or region has violated the bottom line of morality, before it has sincerely corrected and/or apologized, within the scope permitted by objective conditions, it will not be provided with humanitarian services Support, help, cooperate. (In short: do not support [the immoral person] until he sincerely corrects and/or apologizes.)
(3) After knowing that a certain person, unit or region has made a good deed, express respect for the good deed in a timely manner, regardless of the motive of the perpetrator, and regardless of whether the perpetrator is notorious or not. (Explanation: No matter what motive a person has, and no matter whether he is a bad person or not, as long as he does a good deed, people should show respect for the good deed. If you think his motive is wrong or he is using good to cover up evil, you can still Be careful with them, but you can’t disrespect good deeds. If people don’t respect good deeds, always ignore, ridicule or question the motives of good deeds, good deeds will be reduced, and the solidity of the bottom line of society’s moral conscience will be damaged.)
An act that conforms to the content described in the first paragraph is a [behavior of assuming the bottom line of social responsibility].
A person, unit or region that decides and actually begins to act in accordance with the first paragraph can be considered as a [personnel or unit or region that assumes the bottom line of social responsibility].
4. For the behavior of refusing to bear the bottom line of social responsibility, it should be identified as [behavior of violating the bottom line of social responsibility]. This type of behavior especially includes but is not limited to the following behaviors:
(1) After receiving a letter of exhortation or related letters from a third party, the perpetrator still does not actively dissuade and insists on knowing or should know that the unethical behavior of his affiliated organization has not been corrected or sincerely apologized. Enjoy the immoral benefits of lost organizations.
(2) After receiving a letter of admonition or related letters from a third party, the perpetrator still refuses to admonish and insists on knowing or should know that the unethical behavior of a certain person, unit or region has not been corrected or sincerely apologized Provide them with support, assistance, and cooperation other than humanitarianism.
Persons or units or regions who have committed the above behaviors shall be identified as [persons, units or regions that violate the bottom line of social responsibility] or [persons, units or regions that refuse to bear the bottom line of social responsibility] before they sincerely correct or apologize ].
3.5.2 Responsibility attribution, omitted, please refer to the standard directly.
The above content is excerpted from "Introduction to ICE8000 Credit Knowledge" (written by Fang Bangjian, free to use, but please indicate the source)