Appraisal of Evil Actions and Responsibility - World Credit Organization

3.3 Identification of Evil Behavior and Responsibility

Appraisal of evil behavior and responsibility attribution is a right and wrong identification standard and service designed by the World Credit Organization (WCO). .ice8000.org/acnhwgc/96.htm).

People can use this credit service to identify right from wrong. This service can be an independent service, and at the same time, it is generally included in the practice procedures such as internal complaints and credit warnings. Therefore, it is generally not recommended for customers to use the service alone.

3.3.1 Illustrated Flowchart of Evil Support and Attribution of Responsibility

Notes:

One, do not violate the above process. It is a mistake for some practitioners to skip the second step in practice, or not state the second step in the appraisal documents. Because there must be malicious and untrustworthy behavior before there can be evil behavior.

Second, each of the above steps must not be short or confusing. The name of the practice document may be different, but the relevant content must be expressed.

Third, don't directly identify the perpetrator as a supporting organization, the original version is like this. This is no longer the case in the new version. The correct approach is: first identify the evil-supporting behavior, and then identify the perpetrator as the unit responsible for the evil-supporting behavior or the individual responsible for the evil-supporting behavior.

Fourth, the process in the standard is relatively general, and the above process is the decomposition of the process in the standard.

5. Some practitioners identify the unit responsible for malicious dishonesty itself as a supporting unit, and some identify the affiliates of the unit responsible for dishonesty as a supporting unit. This is all wrong, and the act of supporting evil is a relatively light act compared with acts of dishonesty and acts related to dishonesty. For example: Zhang San is a shareholder of Company A, and Company A produced a certain product by polluting the environment, and Li Situ bought the product cheaply. This purchase behavior is a kind of supporting evil behavior. Company A’s environmental pollution behavior is a malicious dishonesty behavior. Zhang San allows Company A’s environmental pollution behavior and enjoys the distribution of related benefits, which is a malicious dishonesty related behavior. Compared with the latter two, Li Si's purchasing behavior is less subjective.

3.3.2 Criteria for Supporting Evil Behavior

1. It is everyone's social responsibility to exhort bad people to abandon evil and do good, and to refuse or stop providing support other than humanitarianism to bad people who do not follow the advice. This social responsibility can be called "Don't Support Evil" , belongs to the minimum standard content of social responsibility, and is the content of social responsibility that every individual, unit, and region should undertake. If everyone refuses to recognize or assume this social responsibility, the moral foundation of human beings will be eroded and human well-being will be lost.

Second, the essence of evil support is a kind of [the bottom line behavior of refusing to assume social responsibility]. Although the act of supporting evil does not directly infringe on the legitimate rights and interests of others, there is a certain indirect causal relationship in the past or in the future that the act of supporting evil has caused the consequences of others or society being violated by untrustworthy acts.

3. After receiving a letter of exhortation from a third party or related letters, if you still do not listen to the admonition and insist on providing support other than humanitarianism to [the person responsible for the malicious dishonesty or the person responsible for the serious dishonesty] behavior is an evil behavior.

Supporting evil behavior, including the following situations:

(1) Not listening to advice, without legitimate reasons, insisting on purchasing products or services from the person responsible for malicious or seriously untrustworthy behavior;

(2) Not listening to advice, insisting on selling products or services to persons responsible for malicious or seriously dishonest acts without legitimate reasons;

(3) Not listening to advice, insisting on hiring or reusing persons responsible for malicious or serious dishonesty without justifiable reasons;

(4) Not listening to advice, without legitimate reasons, insisting on other business cooperation with the person responsible for malicious dishonesty or serious dishonesty;

(5) Not listening to advice, without legitimate reasons, insisting on providing other [other than humanitarian] support for the person responsible for malicious or serious dishonesty.

The above content is excerpted from "Introduction to ICE8000 Credit Knowledge" (written by Fang Bangjian, free to use, but please indicate the source)